Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?

Technology has had a great influence on relationships between people. It affects our lives in various ways, and in my opinion, the development of technologies has both positive and negative effects.
It is oblivious true that novel technologies have a positive impact on education and social life. Firstly, the main argument is that modern technology changes the relationships between students and teachers. Students in many countries now could be easy to enroll courses and attend online classes together without face-to-face meetings. Secondly, with the advent of services like Twitter and Facebook, people find it is not difficult to make connections with others. Virtual social network apps allow people to make new friends who share common interests with them regardless of gender, distance or language.
Apart from the positive contributions of technology mentioned above, there are some negative effects that technology brings to our society. The rapid growth of communication technology tends to isolate people and discourage them from having real relationships. Young children might prefer spending their spare time on the Internet to reading books or having outdoor activities. For example, some parts of youth in Vietnam might choose to make video calls with their friends rather than hang out with them. This is a poor substitute for a real friendship because they could not understand their real friends’ personalities based on their activities in a virtual society.
In conclusion, there are many convincing reasons to understand why technology plays an important role in this contemporary world. However, I believe it has two sides and we should realize it to use technology more useful.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-15 heroprox1 56 view
2023-10-13 MinyiChu 61 view
2023-08-17 hau le 84 view
2023-08-05 Kiwi 89 view
2023-07-05 phamtrucmaiphuong 78 view
Essays by user Tran Bao Long :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47727272727 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92277989804 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640151515152 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.7869457795 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.285714286 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302804091818 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949995097866 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508270636003 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172272159913 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397927889802 0.056905535591 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.