Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Is this a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.

In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Is this a positive or negative development?

When advancements have become inevitable, in this competitive era, technology plays a vital role in framing the developmental blueprint of any nation where people connections with others have changed due to technology. Hence, I personally believe that it is a negative initiative as it leads to many issues in relationship between individuals and reasons for my inclination are elaborated in the forthcoming paragraphs.

First and foremost reason that supports my ideology is, since the smartphones have developed people used communicate in video call instead of physical talk. Consequently, this make people less emotionally attached with their loved ones, and somehow it makes them more introvert. Along with that, due to ongoing pandemic all schools start to teach virtually on online platforms therefore the students can not communicate with their tutors and other students. As a result, it does not only affect to their overall academic grades but also their communication skills.

Moreover, companies are doing all their work online with their employees for that reason they can not work in groups with their colleagues. As a consequence, directly or indirectly it reduces overall profit of the company. Lastly, people are making online friends without even meet them on platforms such as whatsapp, Instagram, etc. Due to this, cases of online fraud have increase significantly.

On the close scrutiny, it can be concluded that there is no doubt that technology has changed each person life, however when it comes to interaction it is a negative development for such purposes. It is hoped that people will understand the effects on their relationships.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-15 heroprox1 56 view
2023-10-13 MinyiChu 61 view
2023-08-17 hau le 84 view
2023-08-05 Kiwi 89 view
2023-07-05 phamtrucmaiphuong 78 view
Essays by user priyal :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'scrutiny'.
Suggestion: scrutiny
... have increase significantly. On the close scrutiny, it can be concluded that there is no d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, therefore, no doubt, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41538461538 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99265372727 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634615384615 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2891638427 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245692638366 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793325657065 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543776211735 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150203505162 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461307634843 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.