Some countries spend a lot of money preparing competitors to take part in major competitions such as Olympic Games or football World Cup. Some people say that it would be better to spend this money encouraging children to take up sports from a young age.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, more and more countries pay attention to sports. However, with the increase of the sports finance in preparing competitors to participate in world’s level competitions, some people think that government need to spend money on inspiring children do sports when their young. I partly agree this opinion because I think government need to pay for the preparation of the competitions, also ought to spend money on the youth sports.
On one hand, countries spend money on preparing competitors who taking part in some world class competitions have many benefits. Firstly, if competitors win the champion, it will improve the nation identity. This is because athletes are fight for the countries which means that they win the competitions, they increase the countries influence in the world and the citizen also get the proud of it. Secondly, when countries spend lots of money to preparing the competitions also means that countries attach important in sports, which can encourage many talented children take part in sport games. Thirdly, preparing competitors to join in the competitions is also one part of the government finance.
On the other hand, when countries spend some money to encourage children do some sports from a young age will have more advantages than preparing competitors who take part in world class competitions. Spending money to encourage children take up sports can help more talented children become successful athletes. For example, in China, many famous athletes all training when they were young, such as Quan Hongchan who won the Olympic Games swimming gold medal, which training when she was 5 years old. Moreover, this will can be benefit for more children who are in poor area. If government spend money to encourage children do sports can help more poor children have chance to touch some common sport because some poor area without physical tool on the communities. Meanwhile, it can make children have a strong body. This is because doing sports can help children have a health lifestyle and benefit for their development of their bodies.
In conclusion, countries not only need to spend money on preparing competitors but also ought to pay for encouraging children to do sports when they are young.
- Some people think personal happiness is closely related to economic success while others believe that it depends on other factors Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 w 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 61
- In some cities governments have tried to reduce traffic congestion For instance they have imposed a congestion tax during rush hour Do you think this development is positive or negative 56
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18681318681 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73227786837 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431318681319 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4035844407 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453813004526 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170209320669 0.084324248473 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128445946168 0.0667982634062 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299366442028 0.151304729494 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462325279088 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18681318681 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73227786837 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431318681319 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4035844407 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453813004526 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170209320669 0.084324248473 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128445946168 0.0667982634062 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299366442028 0.151304729494 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462325279088 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.