Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
The emergence of technology led to improvements in communication. Thanks to the rapid development of the Internet, it is much easier for people to connect with each other by a simple finger-tap. However, the innovation of contact seems beneficial, I insist that there are numerous negative effects on humankind.
With the progress of the communication devices and the Internet, people nowadays can contact others anywhere, anytime. Even though they are in different countries, the interaction itself will not be bothered. Moreover, international companies can make conference calls with their subsidiaries immediately to update important issues. People are also allowed to make new friends from different countries with same interests. The interaction between people has become wider and closer.
Nevertheless, it is no doubt that these kinds of interaction bring people tremendous benefits, there are still potential problems which may lead to danger. First of all, online communication lacks in face-to-face interaction, which loses the opportunity to know the real identity of a stranger. It may become dangerous once be asking out. Furthermore, people are getting lazier to go out and seek for new possibilities to make new friends. This may result in serious health problems and the loss of communication skills. Finally, the interaction through a tablet screen has lost its temperature of communicating with others. It becomes harder to know the real reaction of people, and they may become more suspicious of others.
To sum up, the way people interact now truly brings benefits to society, and I believe technology and communication are inextricably linked from a futuristic perspective. Nevertheless, the potential problem still needs to be fixed before it becomes a serious issue in the near future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-21 | julieehung | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-12 | medinfo91 | 84 | view |
| 2015-04-04 | dr.faisal | 80 | view |
| 2014-07-06 | sandeep pooni | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 84
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this case?What can be done about this problem? 67
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organization.Why might this be the case?What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 61
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The emergence of technology led to impro...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, no doubt, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53046594982 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16771265481 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602150537634 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3233019314 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7647058824 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4117647059 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279233445911 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789683069675 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577086812202 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158967080916 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384806053549 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.