As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that car users should cover the costs. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that car users should cover the costs. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

People have different views about whether the governments should pay for the expense of delivering more road systems due to the increasing number of cars these days or this responsibility belongs to car owners. In my perspective, I strongly believe it is the governments’ duty to spend budget on supplying the transport infrastructures to the people.

On the one hand, only the governments have the authority and resource to establish the road systems in large scale. Big contracts with constructing companies have to be signed before any projects begin. Such contracts always demands a huge amount of money which is out of reach for any private corporations, organizations or individuals. Therefore, only the governments are capable of handling this enormous task.

On the other hand, every car user has paid for the expense of transportation systems. When they first buy a vehicle, owners have to pay the taxes before taking the cars on the road. This money is then returned to the governments’ fund as contribution of buying cars and using public transport systems. Furthermore, every country demands constant fees from vehicles’ owners to maintain and expand transport infrastructure every year. Thus, there is no reason for the people who own a car to pay for road constructing projects any further.

In conclusion, it is the governments’ jobs to spend money on roads systems because the people have already paid with the taxes and they also do not have the authority and resource.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-03-14 Jay1708 67 view
2018-12-12 minh2001 56 view
2018-10-10 huongquynh 78 view
2018-09-21 phuong cao 89 view
2018-05-27 drtruong92 56 view
Essays by user drtruong92 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, thus, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24691358025 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23896809577 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56378600823 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1840387006 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.25 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266616358011 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977554616012 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835581943889 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157056743775 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798514979335 0.056905535591 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.