As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the user should cover the costs. Discuss and give your opinion.
The rising popularity of automobiles has contributed to an urgent demand of investments in transport infrastructure. While many people believe that this expenditure should be covered by the authority, I am in favor of the idea that it should be charged by travelers.
On the one hand, the government is thought to be responsible for road investments because of several reasons. Firstly, as an administrative organ maintaining domestic tranquility, it is acceptable to hold the authority accountable for assuring citizen’s safety status. Therefore, road safety measures such as installing speed cameras or appointing traffic wardens, which make it possible to supervise residents’ adherence to traffic law and, thus, alleviate risks of accidents, must be implemented by the government. Furthermore, providing funding for transport infrastructure, states can also promote economic growth. Indeed, if a more flexible and modern road system is established, companies will be able to speed up their journey time, which results in a lower fixed cost and a higher profit thanks to shorter transport duration.
On the other hand, it seems to me that the idea of charging travelers for road-upgrading costs is more reasonable. Specifically, there has been a consensus that people directly taking advantage of a transport system cannot ask others to tackle its depreciation and inconvenience. Hence, drivers, who spend many hours on these roads every day, must shoulder this responsibility. Additionally, it is expected that the expense will make their car utilizations reduce, as we see when the government raised petrol price or offered congestion charge in Bangkok or Jakarta. As a result, this helps them ease traffic flow, as well as trigger many heated traffic issues, like rush hour traffic jam.
Briefly, although government assistance is recommended, I still believe that expenses for road improvement must be handled by users.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-14 | Jay1708 | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-12 | minh2001 | 56 | view |
| 2018-10-10 | huongquynh | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-21 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
| 2018-05-27 | drtruong92 | 56 | view |
- the only way to improve safety of out roads is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses.To what extent do you agree? 84
- The map below shows the changes of a village in 1995 and now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- In many countries imprisonment is the most common solution to crimes. However some people believe that better education will be a more effective solution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The table below shows the number of cars produced in 3 countries between 2003 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the internet, and they can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... thanks to shorter transport duration. On the other hand, it seems to me that ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic issues, like rush hour traffic jam. Briefly, although government assistance...
^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d improvement must be handled by users.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55892255892 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27227345789 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649831649832 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3162457644 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6923076923 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178267931248 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605453652488 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560743091177 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11430492743 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03262586521 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.