In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
We live in an age when many of us are used to traveling around a lot, which why transportation has often been discussed yet rarely understood. While many people believed that money should be invested in new railway lines constructed, other people argued that enhance public transport is more important. The following essay takes a look at both sides of the argument.
It's obvious that railway trains give fast and convenient travel. Especially nowadays people in need of travel long distances for more affordable houses and jobs, high-speed trains help them to limit the time and also efficiently. However, build railway lines cost a large amount of money while not all countries can earn.
On the other hand, public transport has more than one benefit. The first point worth considering is that public transport such as buses, trains,... also been known as Eco-friendly transport, it dumps out less pollution than every other kind. Furthermore, public transport can carry a large number of people with just a cheap price which is flexible and necessary for everyone to afford. Last but not least, public transport is believed to reduce traffic jams in the rush hour when there are a lot of vehicles on the road. By contrast, public transport only serves in short distances. Despite the pros and cons, to my perspective, the disadvantages of public transport still outweigh the disadvantages.
In conclusion, although I tend to stand for public transport for its environmentally friendly and cost less for the upgrade process, the transport issue still depends a lot on the finances of a country and people's demand. If a country is necessary to build railway lines for such fast trains to serve the citizens' demand, I believe the benefits are those that couldn't be denied.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport 73
- Many companies sponsor sports as a way for advertising themselves Some people think it is good for the world of sports while others think there are disadvantages to this Discuss both sides and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...t public transport such as buses, trains,... also been known as Eco-friendly trans...
^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...Furthermore, public transport can carry a large number of people with just a cheap price which is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
..., I believe the benefits are those that couldnt be denied.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, still, while, in conclusion, in short, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04761904762 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7540184314 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3177431805 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359707613556 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113023441635 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860139431089 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210333806774 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254931143244 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.