In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi

Essay topics:

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Country transportation has very indispensable for the civilians and most of country people prefer railway as a transportation, so one group think government should establish new tracks to become faster train. However, Other group of individual believe resources should be spent on existing vehicles. I will be articulated both prospective and I agree with the former view.

First and foremost ,Spending on railway it is beneficial for country public transportation because mostly people catch train for their work and other outside things, hence, When the number of lanes increasing that time convenient for train passenger. Additionally, people are reached their destination in less time by train. Also, the trains number went up, therefore railway station and inside train not becoming very congested. People are visiting their destination without feel tired. To example, Japan people are using train for their work, which has the highest number across the world for use train.

On the other hand, Government transport, which is exciting today vital for us, government should be spent money on public transport such as bus. Because, many areas not have facility of railway station, thus, people not use trains. But in this type of area also people use city buses instead of trains. And that is reason improving facility of buses beneficial for passenger.

To conclude, New railway lanes and present time transport vehicle both are important and beneficial but in future railway becoming more convenient and faster. People also like it, so government should make new tracks for trains.

Votes
Average: 4.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-10-20 Amarpreet Singh 73 view
2022-07-31 Quốc 61 view
2021-11-18 christine112 82 view
2021-11-15 Mohsensnake 78 view
2021-11-01 bangtaenie_77 89 view
Essays by user Harsh1042003 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the former view. First and foremost ,Spending on railway it is beneficial for...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, so, therefore, thus, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.392 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69649847024 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.0661052978 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2857142857 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356114710731 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115295792576 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659545659114 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206739436866 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568953778564 0.056905535591 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.