In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes

Essay topics:

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

A tremendous number of countries have witnessd a debate in the use of money in transport, one focus on the only railway while one pay much care on other means of transporting. Individually, I believe the second one can be more beneficial compare to the first notion.

The first group prioritize thr velocity and longevity of trains.To exemplify, a train could last and be used in long durability. They are more suitable for long-term purposes such as logistic and goods transporting. Moreover, due to the train’s feature, they could travel more effectively with high speed. Special railways are made for them so there will not be any stops between stations and transport conjunction is not a frequent risk while using train, lower the time-consuming stage that many others can experience while traveling in rush hours.

On the other hand,bother vehicles can supprass these potentials under wise control. Using a wide range of transporting is much more flexible anf versatile. For illustration, airplans have a accelerated speed, which is superior and can not be outspeed, whilst motorbikes can provide transportation from person to person, targeting the convenience that the customer will savor. Furthermore, oversea transporting and travelling mostly are the domain of planrs and ships, meaning sea and air vehicles are used in commonplace, whereas railway lines may become less useful and comfortable.

In conclusion, personally, I think the benefits we can reap from these transportings can outweigh the train’s one. Henceforth, governments should allocate their money on existing one’s development instead of building more and more railways.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-02-20 MinyiChu 67 view
2024-02-03 Wardiati Yusuf 61 view
2024-02-03 Wardiati Yusuf 61 view
2024-02-03 Wardiati Yusuf 67 view
2023-12-30 Tường Vân 73 view
Essays by user vinhvinhvinh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...ze thr velocity and longevity of trains.To exemplify, a train could last and be us...
^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , bother
...ling in rush hours. On the other hand,bother vehicles can supprass these potentials ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...satile. For illustration, airplans have a accelerated speed, which is superior an...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, whereas, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47081712062 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07901859261 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657587548638 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2515768827 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.166666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185033951601 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636946279718 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350728807279 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114361707471 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191445568631 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...ze thr velocity and longevity of trains.To exemplify, a train could last and be us...
^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , bother
...ling in rush hours. On the other hand,bother vehicles can supprass these potentials ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...satile. For illustration, airplans have a accelerated speed, which is superior an...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, whereas, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47081712062 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07901859261 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657587548638 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2515768827 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.166666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185033951601 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636946279718 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350728807279 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114361707471 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191445568631 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.