Transportation between countries is of crucial importance, as well as keep it updated with the latest technology. One way is to upgrade the already existing public transport vehicles or renew the system altogether. Since the latter involves large amounts of money both views should be pondered, but in my opinion an investment on a new and faster train is the way to go.
On one hand, improving the existing buses and trains can be cheaper and more practical as well as more costumer friendly. Definitely the government will spend much more money if they have to built all the tracks from scratch and probability the old transport still needed some upgrades as well. Moreover, people are used to go on the regular transports, specially older citizens and a radical change can lead to adaptation issues. These points should be kept in mind, but there is another side to think about.
Although sometimes change is difficult, it can lead to better outcomes in the end. Newer trains are faster and also attract more tourists for example. When the travelling time is decreased more costumers can think on ridding the train, so if can be positive for the traveller but also for the state that earn more money with the extra tickets. Also the tourists can be increased, because everyone loves to reach the destination as fast as possible, especially with more comfort, as happen in newer trains. Furthermore more tourists means again more money, so in the end it is all an investment.
To conclude, we can say that change is never easy, but in this case it should be considered seriously because we aren't just talking about new and better conditions for the travellers but also financial investment as well. As a recommendation I will also add, that a study should be made to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of a such big investment.
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...should be pondered, but in my opinion an investment on a new and faster train is ...
^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'costumer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: costumer
...e cheaper and more practical as well as more costumer friendly. Definitely the government wil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t there is another side to think about. Although sometimes change is difficult, ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...earn more money with the extra tickets. Also the tourists can be increased, because ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ore comfort, as happen in newer trains. Furthermore more tourists means again more money, s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tourists'' or 'tourist's'?
Suggestion: tourists'; tourist's
...appen in newer trains. Furthermore more tourists means again more money, so in the end i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ould be considered seriously because we arent just talking about new and better condi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, well, for example, talking about, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87579617834 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7337921683 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566878980892 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3830727063 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.357142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205299014727 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684555164297 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451463556631 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124428986938 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337770582596 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.