In the modern world, it is generally argued that the cash flow of money should be spend on developing railway lines for high tech trains rather than the existing community transport. In my essay i will analyze both views and state my point.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why it would be a better option for the publicity. Advocates to the allocation of money to the existing means of public transport may claim that it would be more efficiently when putting money on the existing ones because it is cheaper. It is undeniable that the spending on the old ones may helps the government save a big amount of money and therefore, allocate it to a more diverse category such as medicine and health or environment to improve the urban sustainability.
On the other hand, i would stand for the construction of new railway lines for high tech trains. By taking this option, it enable us the chance to ultilize the developments of technology. To be more precise, many citizens have to get to the public hub to reach their destinations, the benefits of this helps reducing the time required for city dwellers. Furthermore, It is not only cater for publice service, but a variety of jobs required to maintain. For instance, it offers a number of works and therefore, stabilize the society.
Putting every points into consideration, while there are many supporters for the old means of transport, it appeals to me that it would be a better idea to invest money on new mean of social public transport.
- The internet is viewed as an excellent means of communication by many However there are some who would argue that it is actually destroying our communication skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 72
- Many people say that we have developed into a “throw-away”culture, because we are filling up our environment with so manyplastic bags and rubbish that we cannot fully dispose of. To whatextent do you agree with this opinion and what measures can youre 73
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving the existing public transport. Discuss bo 56
- Life in the 21st century is better than the previous century To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons and support with relevant examples 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
...d that the cash flow of money should be spend on developing railway lines for high te...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...isting community transport. In my essay i will analyze both views and state my po...
^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...n sustainability. On the other hand, i would stand for the construction of new...
^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'enables'?
Suggestion: enables
... tech trains. By taking this option, it enable us the chance to ultilize the developme...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ach their destinations, the benefits of this helps reducing the time required for ci...
^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to reduce' or 'reduce'.
Suggestion: to reduce; reduce
...estinations, the benefits of this helps reducing the time required for city dwellers. Fu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, may, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74904942966 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75133353091 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555133079848 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0255002364 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.545454545 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291842670375 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101387173008 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080735967821 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170142378201 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192702017922 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.