Government spending on new transportation is always a debatable topic amongst several groups of people. Supporters of the idea put forth that diverting funds toward introducing new transportation lead to the development of nation well-being, while some believe that it is necessary to improve the condition of existing state-run transport. This essay discusses both views and includes my opinion before drawing a reasonable conclusion.
People in many countries ascertain that available monetary resources could be put to use in improving the condition of existing road transport as it is more cheaper than those fast trains and also needed for public's daily use. This means using available money for improving roads condition, hiring more professional staff for running transport on time and improving transportation for inaccessible areas. To exemplify, in a country like India where children from many rural areas, are not able to reach their schools on time because of the unavailability of transport. So diverting funds toward such areas cater to increased literacy rates.
However, investing in such areas are vital. People in big cities prefer to have fast and extensive rail communication for example bullet trains which connect multiple cities and make easy for the public to transit from one place to another in very less time. Allocating a large part of the budget towards the development of new transportation modes help not only to reach different regions easily but also plays a key role in boosting the country's economy. It is also the case that connecting multiple regions using modern transportation modes also portray a positive picture of a nation and helps to take pride in if it becomes famous. For instance, toy trains in Shimla have proven a positive construction for attracting tourists from all over the world.
To conclude, I personally believe that, even though smart funding investment in modern and fast transport is beneficial for national development, allocating money to existing transport is also necessary.
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDisucss both the 84
- A letter to your friend traveling overseas. You are staying at their apartment and there was a storm.Tell your friend about the storm.Tell them what was damaged and details what repairs need to be done. 73
- Some people think that killing animals for food is cruel, but other claim that animals are a necessary part of diet. What’s your opinion? 78
- These days, more and more people are going to other countries for significant periods of time, either to find a job or to study. There are clearly many benefits to doing this, but people who live abroad can also face some difficulties.Discuss advantages a 73
- Today, the younger and older generations are in the same workplace. Is this more an advantage or more disadvantage? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cheaper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cheaper
...ion of existing road transport as it is more cheaper than those fast trains and also needed ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38629283489 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95286023143 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604361370717 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3236831233 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203527521597 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651220170041 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550775035123 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122908715552 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00904590665745 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.