In a number of countries, some people thinks it’s necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
In nowadays advancing times, numerous people in several different countries believe that money should be invested in the construction of fast train railways to allow rapid transport from city to city. However, others may say that this money would be better invested in improving public transport, which is already available. In my opinion, the maintenance of existing transport would be a better idea and overall more profitable for both the government and the general public.
The construction of fast trains would make travelling between cities very easy. For example, bullet trains in Japan have allowed its population to travel very easily from city to city, thus allowing people to conserve their precious time and energy. This has specially been very beneficial for businesses and tourists, as businessmen can attend multiple meetings during the day in several different locations and tourists can easily travel to and fro from various destinations and not be limited to one city. This ease of travel allowed by the bullet trains has lead to a fruitful economic boom for Japan and its economy.
Although I acknowledge the above advantages, the majority of people in many cities usually benefit more considerably from existing transport as they travel more frequently within the city, with the exception of businessmen and tourists. These people rely on trams, subways, buses etc. to commute to work, school and several other places within their city. Thus, investing money into these modes of transport and bringing about simple yet effective changes would vastly benefit millions of people. For instance, an addition of new bus routes would allow easier travel for people going to work or even reducing fare rates would be hugely beneficial for members of the public belonging to lower socioeconomic backgrounds.
In conclusion, many people believe that the construction of high-speed trains should be prioritized and that’s where the funds should be invested. On the other hand, some say these funds would be better spent on upgrading existing public transport. I believe, that the money should be spent on improvements which can benefit a larger group of people, thus it would be wiser to improve public transport, as travel between cities may become redundant in the future for businesses as many may choose to work from online platforms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- In a number of countries some people thinks it s necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 73
- In a number of countries some people thinks it s necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: Nowadays
In nowadays advancing times, numerous people in sev...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...ays advancing times, numerous people in several different countries believe that money should be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 462, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...fitable for both the government and the general public. The construction of fast trains wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...end multiple meetings during the day in several different locations and tourists can easily trave...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...travel more frequently within the city, with the exception of businessmen and tourists. These people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 482, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
...dundant in the future for businesses as many may choose to work from online platforms. ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1986.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28191489362 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65753112995 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523936170213 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.1252441382 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.4 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35500327825 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128217424065 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795335958119 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238263016349 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971821098829 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.