It is true that there is a huge amount of distance from the wealthy to the destitute and this gap become rapidly bigger all around the world. There are several reasons which explain this issue and I would argue that some solutions should be taken to tackle these causes.
There are two fundamental reasons why the class differences enlarge. The first reason is that the lack of works in the lower and middle class make them grow poorer. Because the demand for both national and multinational corporations was too high, people and the young in particular have not got any chances to work for them. Consequently, many people, who have just graduate their college, become unemployed and do not make any kinds of profit. The second reason is that the infrastructure has not enough convenient for people to approach. For instance, the residents in the rural areas in some regions of the world live without the electric, clean water and classes at all. Thus, these people, who are lack of knowledge due to no education, become the victim of the destitute when the labour exploitation occurs.
However, some measures should be taken to mitigate the problem of the unbridgeable gap between the two class. One step is that the business should create many positions for their recruitment. If people easily had the opportunity in their major, unemployment would extremely decrease. Therefore, the class differences significantly become small thanks to the fact that a huge amount of money will be earned easier in the lower class. Another essential measure is the Governments should improve the infrastructure in their countries. If the authorities know how to shorten the class differences, their countries will be developt successfully. For example, Singapore was a poor fishing village in the century of the nineteenth; but after 80 years it is the centre of economy in the world.
In conclusion, the distance between the wealthy and the destitute is a huge problem for the modern life of human being and solutions should be implemented to tackle this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 695, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...and classes at all. Thus, these people, who are lack of knowledge due to no education, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0293255132 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76551250986 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539589442815 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8548449333 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.882352941 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168664072874 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505115922475 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583798802395 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117733491024 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496334351155 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.