Online education is becoming more and more popular. Some people claim that e-learning has so many benefit that it will replace face - to - face education. Others say that traditional education is irreplaceable. Discuss both view and give your opinion.

Nowadays education doesn’t have to be provided by schools or learning centres because there are lots of learning platforms on the internet which is also more popular. Some people believe that online learning has many advantages more than face-to-face learning while the naysayers say that e-learning cannot replace the original style of learning.

Online education platforms which have been advanced by higher technology have some reasons to pinpoint their benefit. Firstly, learning from e-learning is convenient and flexible because learners can study every time if they can access the internet. To further explain, people who cannot participate the class because of having unstable time schedule can apply and learn in online class which can reach all the time. Moreover, online class can provide many courses more than traditional courses. For instance, people who live in undeveloped area would have less opportunity to join a class that they prefer due to unavailable courses, but they can learn it from e-learning. Therefore, it could increase opportunity to learn and fulfil inequality of learning gap.

However, the original style of learning which is face-to-face cannot be denied and also have many benefits. First, this kind of learning can give students opportunity to communicate with real instructor. In particular, when students have a doubt in lesson, they can ask for clear explanation from teacher. Eventually, students can be advised or can get clarification. In addition, participating in face-to-face class will provide classmate which learners can have more friends to discuss about the lesson. In that case, they can gain more knowledges from exchange the opinion each other.

To conclude, both online education and face-to-face education have many advantages. While e-learning has more convenience and flexibility of time and places as well as provides variety of courses, face-to-face learning give more opportunity to ask with real educator and discuss among classmates

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to while'
Suggestion: to while
...antages more than face-to-face learning while the naysayers say that e-learning canno...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, in particular, kind of, of course, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57189542484 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87095734677 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52614379085 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4546728644 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5625 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334519221646 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129590210461 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107684068333 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261508341071 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112816996575 0.056905535591 198% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.