The only way to improve road safety is to impose severe punishment for driving offences. Do you agree or disagree ?
Whether administering harsh penalties for driving-laws breaking offenders is the sole method in order to enhance traffic security has been a subject of heated debates. While it is undeniable that our society could reap tremendous merits from these strict punishments, I strongly argue that extra efficient measures should be taken into consideration.
On the one hand, severe punishments, such as small fines, license suspension or even lengthy prison sentences which are likely to act as a deterrent to potential traffic-rule violators, are proven to be beneficial in certain aspects. To illustrate, those wrongdoers who were deterred from crossing the red light or committing the same serious offences would become more self-disciplined and alert with their driving habits. As a result, there might be a noticeable decline in daily traffic accidents which may pose a detrimental threat to road safety.
On the other hand, there are several practical regulations deserving a great deal of public concern. Firstly, the government is advisable to launch propagation campaigns about traffic safety education and facilitate driver awareness courses. This can help road users not only be well-equipped with knowledge of rules and driving skills but also entirely comprehend the dangers of aggressive driving. Thus, they will avoid perpetrating these socially-unacceptable wrongdoings. Additionally, the state budget should be properly distributed to the instruction free-of-charge passes of public transport systems that can encourage more residents to commute by buses or trains; thereby eradicating the pressing matter of chaos traffic congestions caused by a large density of vehicles in streets.
In conclusion, while there is no doubt that strict punishments are highly essential, from my perspective, the crucial role of raising awareness of drivers and improving traffic infrastructure should not be overestimated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-21 | king123478 | 89 | view |
| 2020-10-21 | king123478 | 95 | view |
| 2016-12-07 | math | 87 | view |
- organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the enviroment 67
- many people think it is very important to protect the environment but they make no effort to do it themselves why is the case what actions can be done to encourage individuals to protect the environment 61
- The only way to improve road safety is to impose severe punishment for driving offences Do you agree or disagree 95
- The only way to improve road safety is to impose severe punishment for driving offences Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from my perspective, the crucial role of raising awareness of drivers and improvi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, may, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79225352113 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28903209118 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.707746478873 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.6407790676 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.545454545 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114925998412 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377817265867 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290932986269 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0610098593685 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119180268319 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.88 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.