The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Guaranteeing the safety and security of traffic and driving is one of the top priorities among many nations around the world. It is argued that in order to enhance safety when participating in traffic is putting much more severe punishments for delinquent drivers. From my standpoint, educating to raise awareness for residents and upgrade the public transport system would have a positive impact in a long term due to penalties cannot solve the issue thoroughly.
Admittedly, increasing the stricter punishments as putting a higher fine may reduce the proportion of traffic accidents or jam-packaged, which boosts the safety of roads. To be more specific, this practice definitely makes traffic participants afraid because of losing their money and indirectly losing their sufficient job, which leads to minimizing their income to cover living expenses. With people who get married, they have to take responsibility for their children, thereby desiring to set a good model in order to encourage their children to follow. Therefore, they may try their best to avoid mistakes in terms of breaking the law. This will generate a safer environment for other commuters.
Nonetheless, this proposal is not optimal by itself since there are two other measures that should sit alongside severe punishments for the best outcome. First and foremost, the government should launch various campaigns throughout the year with the aim of raising the public’s awareness in regard to serious consequences such as injuries, being held in heavy traffic, and even death. Accordingly, this approach will enhance citizens’ cognition and their liability when controlling their vehicles. For example, there are numerous posters which are hang on the street, and vivid infographic on different social platforms, creating more positive influence on the attitude of people. Another method is for the government should invest more budget to improve the public transportation infrastructure such as bus services so that citizens will be destined for using them in their daily life. This can lead to a decline in the number of people utilizing private vehicles and thus safer roads.
In conclusion, although putting severe restrictions on driving offenders may encourage safer commuting, I still believe that other solutions, including the best quality of transportation system and a well-rounded perception of traveling when combined will bring more effective outcomes. Therefore, it is advisable that all three options should be taken into consideration by the authorities to address traffic problems effectively.
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems To what extend do you agree 89
- Topic Some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty others think that crime is a result of bad person s nature Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people think that some individuals are naturally good leaders while others think individuals can learn leadership skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Topic Some people argue that we should do research into our family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations 70
- Topic Fewer young people choose to work in farming What are the reasons Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2198.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53652392947 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97899598356 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596977329975 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3593047705 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.375 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8125 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0995127637044 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352805428827 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387912813544 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0629499296379 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368651065319 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2198.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53652392947 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97899598356 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596977329975 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3593047705 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.375 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8125 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0995127637044 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352805428827 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387912813544 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0629499296379 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368651065319 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.