The only way to improve the safety on our roads is to have stricter punishment for driving offenders.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, the upsurge in the number of road accidents has sparked controversy about the most effective solution for this negative urban development. Some people are of the opinion that, for improvement of road’s safety, the only way is to set tighter road rules while others do not take the same position on this issue. Yet to the best of my knowledge, I completely reject this notion as I can see many pitfalls in implementing stricter rules on roads.
The first reason why having tight punishment on roads cannot bring safety on them is rooted in this fact that other tight laws in every domain of society have not been able to persuade citizens to obey governmental rules. For example, the vast majority of nations, if not all, executed their offensive criminals a century ago while this action failed to reduce the rate of crime in their communities. Now, rule setters are totally aware that tight road rules not only improve the safety on the roads but also it might bring opposite outcomes eventually.
Another justification is that it has been proved that road offenders disobey road rules because they do not have a great insight about them. In most cases, they become aware about a rule when they have become charged by a police officer. There is little room for doubt that the tighter road rule will be implemented, the more difficult they will be to be realized by citizens. It is obvious that citizens have abilities and definitely it would be impossible for some walks of life to adapt themselves with new road rules.
In the light of these facts, one can conclude that setting stricter punishments for driving offenders would not be able to enhance the safety of roads because the history of mankind has portrayed tight rules as a counter-effective action. Furthermore, disobeying governmental laws should not be answered by tight punishment as its reason is the lack of knowledge.
- Some people argue that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, and only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The only way to improve the safety on our roads is to have stricter punishment for driving offenders.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- tobacco is an addictive substance, but people have been using it freely.Some people say tobacco products (such as cigarettes and smoking pipes) should be made illegal.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- English is spreading all around the world as a global language. Is this a positive or negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...plementing stricter rules on roads. The first reason why having tight punish...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... bring opposite outcomes eventually. Another justification is that it has bee...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dapt themselves with new road rules. In the light of these facts, one can con...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90461538462 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66531523941 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556923076923 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.4038301041 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.833333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0833333333 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233470919987 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867212565528 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555720856478 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143539161052 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173949158586 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.