In order to solve traffic problems governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution

Essay topics:

In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?

It is argued that to improve traffic issues, governments ought to impose high taxes on people owning private automobiles and use that money to upgrade public transportation infrastructure. This essay will demonstrate how this solution can mitigate pollution but will also show the drawback it places on car owners.
The most evident advantage when taxing personal cars heavily and investing more in mass transit is that the number of private automobiles may be significantly reduced. In order to save money, people will intend to switch to more economical and options like carpooling and public transportation. Not only will the intention relieve traffic congestion but also help improve air quality. When fewer cars are used, the amount of toxic exhaust fumes will surely decrease and the carbon footprint will be limited. This has a positive effect on the environment since carbon dioxide is one of the main causes for global warming and climate change.
On the other hand, there is an obvious disadvantage to such a solution. In many rural areas, people do not have access to public transportation and it can cause many inconveniences to commuters. In order to go to school or work, they will have to either walk or drive their own vehicles. When taxes are imposed, people have no choice but to spend more money. Moreover, the countryside usually have a lower living standard compared to urban centers, therefore, heavy taxes will place a financial burden on them.
In conclusion, even though the high taxes benefit the environment, they can also result in difficulties for people living in the countryside.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-19 Nguyen051207 73 view
2023-04-08 macanh0811 view
2022-12-13 Ahmad Ilham Zamzami 73 view
2022-12-09 ieltsmaster 73 view
2021-12-20 XuTM1401 78 view
Essays by user XuTM1401 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14448669202 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84356250263 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615969581749 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9419971657 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.076923077 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235848696234 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766873313534 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726236766771 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131142021119 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759577410733 0.056905535591 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.