In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
In this day and age, given that traffic problems are escalating, it is debatable whether governments ought to levy tax on private car owners heavily and use the money to allocate for public transportation quality. This essay will delve into the pros and cons of such a solution.
On one hand, the aforementioned approach can do wonders for the whole society. To commence, the number of cars will be curbed thanks to the heavy tax. Specifically, as the new tax is adopted, more people have to be wary about their decisions to purchase and own a car, culminating in less demand for cars. As a result, the traffic emissions, the main culprit to air pollution, will dwindle. Secondly, traffic congestion can be controlled due to this solution. To shed light on, it is the poor condition of public conveyance that blights one’s experience, resulting in their unwillingness to use public transportation again. Therefore, if the money gained from car tax is allocated for revamping public transportations, the upgraded quality will attract more and more commuters.
On the other hand, some demerits still exist in this remedy. Firstly, public transportation cannot meet everyone’s demand when it comes to traveling a long way. Owing to fixed routes, public conveyance is not available at any time, causing difficulties for people to catch. For example, people have to wrestle with an unexpected event if they have no choice but to wait for the next bus. Moreover, in some areas, the network of public transportation is not wide enough, rendering commuters unable to use or have to endure overcrowding. Secondly, levying a heavy tax on car owners may wreak havoc on the car industry. Due to the fact that this sector makes up a huge part of the economy, if the demand for cars decreases, many countries will endure a gigantic loss of interest. Simultaneously, the escalating unemployment rate may also be a consequence of this policy. Car industry has created scores of jobs for citizens, including mechanics, car assemblers, etc. Hence, if this solution is applied, many people will suffer from being unemployed, unable to support their family as well as committing misdeeds.
In conclusion, I opine that besides the advantages such as reducing air pollution and traffic congestion, as well as encouraging people to use public transport, this solution still contains some problems such as inflexibility, economic downturn. Therefore, it should be pondered thoroughly whether this policy should be incorporated or not.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-19 | Nguyen051207 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | macanh0811 | view | |
| 2022-12-13 | Ahmad Ilham Zamzami | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | ieltsmaster | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | XuTM1401 | 78 | view |
- The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live think and behave However some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life To what extent do you agree or disagree w 60
- In order to solve traffic problems governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution 73
- Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and methods of preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- More people are stressed today than ever before What are the causes of this stress What can be done to address this problem 73
- More people are stressed today than ever before What are the causes of this stress What can be done to address this problem 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 409.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1662591687 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03676537038 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557457212714 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0650454479 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.619047619 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4761904762 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90476190476 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276164137235 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754260627414 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852990330531 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202774671686 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782861332173 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.