In order to solve traffic problems, goverments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
The advancement of the world has brought many benefits, but it has also brought some drawbacks. Due to the boom in the automobile industry, there has been a significant rise in traffic congestion on the roads, which is one of the most pressing problems. The government can solve this issue by levying a heavier tax on private vehicle owners and reinvesting the proceeds to upgrade the public transit system. Thus, imposing high taxes will have certain advantages, but it will also have disadvantages.
The imposition of a significant tax on respective car owners will be advantageous in a variety of ways. To begin with, taxation will deter many people from purchasing cars, resulting in fewer private cars on the road and less traffic congestion. If private automobiles are heavily taxed, public transportation such as buses and trains will become more popular, resulting in fewer vehicles on the road and cleaner air. Concurrently, people will be encouraged to use the carpooling system, which will help reduce pollution and the overuse of fuel and gasoline.
However, the disadvantages of this solution appear to outweigh the benefits because automobile purchases constitute a significant portion of any economy. As a result of the increased financial burden on car owners, the implementation of taxes will have a negative impact on human employment and livelihood. Furthermore, higher taxes will discourage people from purchasing private vehicles, which could be a problem if public transportation is unavailable in an emergency. Besides, people who are struggling financially but need a car to get to work will be impacted because they will be forced to sell their vehicles and lose their jobs if they cannot afford the levy.
To sum up, traffic congestion has reached alarming proportions, and levying a tax on private automobile owners to encourage people to use public transportation has emerged as a viable option. It does, however, have a negative impact on car sales and may cause prejudice. As a result, levying a high automobile tax rate on private car owners to alleviate traffic congestion has both advantages and disadvantages that cannot be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-09 | astu | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | Nguyen051207 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | macanh0811 | view | |
| 2022-12-13 | Ahmad Ilham Zamzami | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | ieltsmaster | 73 | view |
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- In order to solve traffic problems goverments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution 73
- Some people think young people should go to university to further their education while others think they should be encouraged to work as car mechanics or builders etc to serve society Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- More children in developed countries are becoming overweight This is a serious problem for wealthy countries Discuss some causes and effects of this problem 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, thus, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06868971812 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7214951035 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.8 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257737103696 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915426345909 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706219945846 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167115491739 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612926499556 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.