Organized tour to remote community and other countries is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment?
Organizing travellers to rural areas and other regions has become popular these days. I personally think that it is a positive movement to the economic development of local people as well as their surroundings.
Tourism can benefit local’s revenue. Locals can receive annual income from tickets to the places of interest purchased by tourist. Travellers, indeed, tend to give extra payment to the local people in purpose of appreciating their products such as local crafts and native cuisines. Likewise, this condition can help to re-build the environment, for a lot of travellers went to remote areas with campaigning green world society. In Indonesia, for example, a lot of tourists visiting Papua, one of the most remote areas in the region, eventually rise the living standard of locals and re-planting a bunch of trees to build healthier environment. The more tourist visiting remote areas, the better the local income and environment are.
Nevertheless, some individuals argue that travellers will only give destructive impacts on rural areas. Furthermore, they said that vast majority of tourists are selfish and tend to discredit the local's culture. For instance, tourists usually act rude to local ceremonies. These people ilustarte the condition of what was happened in Papua New Guinie when tourists intentionally disturb local ceremonies by taking photographs, which is not allowed according to local’s rules there.
Sadly, the disagrement of allocating tours to rural areas is only based on false information. Some information refering to negative impact on tourists visiting rural places is manipulated by politician who put this given circumtance as their materials for political campaign.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is important to organize in remote areas to escalate local’s living standard as well as re-build healthier environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-16 | trikhung777 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | nguyenhnil | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | Revivo Tulaseket | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | Revivo Tulaseket | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-20 | minh HUP | 89 | view |
- The prevention of health problems and health illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extent do you agree 67
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers What factors do you think influence these decisions Do we become used to bad news Would it be better if more good news was reported 56
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 84
- Some people believe that the radio is more enjoyable and practical than TV What is your opinion 61
- Nowadays many people have access to computers on a wide basis and a large number of children play computer games What are the negative impacts of children playing computer games and what can be done to minimize the bad effects 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l people as well as their surroundings. Tourism can benefit local’s revenue. Loc...
^^^^
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urchased by tourist. Travellers, indeed, tend to give extra payment to the local ...
^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...local ceremonies. These people ilustarte the condition of what was happened in Pa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, likewise, nevertheless, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52083333333 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98141588236 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590277777778 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8267646029 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259263291947 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084183977209 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463387940994 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140114763143 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062206128738 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.