Organized tours to remote communities and other countries are increasingly popular.
Is it a positive or negative
development for the local people and environment?
There has been a trend in which visitors are arranged and guided to remote areas or foreign countries as they pay for their trips. Despite certain drawbacks, I hold a notion that travelling to distant places or other nation would be bring more benefits, especially to the people in the community and the environment.
For a variety of reasons, several advantages can be considered when there is an increasing number of people travelling to underdeveloped areas and other countries. To begin with, it is obvious that when people visit a destination, they will need to be fed and watered as well as to be sheltered. This means that there will be employment opportunities for the locals if they offer various services, such as accommodations, to visitors. In addition to this, once the number of tourists to a place grows, a huge sum of revenue through ticket fares will be collected. If the budgets from tourism are well spent on conserving these places, the local environment will somehow be restored and maintained for tourist purposes.
Apart from the aforementioned upsides, there are also some downsides that are note-worthy. First, numerous groups of visitors can result in disturbance for the minor communities. To explain, for small countries or areas with minor races, if there is an exceeding number of visitors to a place, they might accidentally jeopardise the lifesyle of these local people as some tribal people do not want their life to be publicly exposed. Moreover, not all individuals are aware of the importance of environmental protection. In other words, more tourists may increase the amount of litter to the environment, damaging the local sceneries and cause pollution.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that certain trips to remote places can bring more beneficial influences to the community and environment, though there might still be some downsides of this trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-16 | trikhung777 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | nguyenhnil | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | Revivo Tulaseket | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | Revivo Tulaseket | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-20 | minh HUP | 89 | view |
- Some people think that newspaper and TV news are the best way to learn about current events However others believe that they can learn news better through social media Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences and only government action can solve the problem To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, apart from, as to, in addition, such as, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23151125402 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01932855962 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556270096463 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7176644046 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.153846154 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20007299355 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689877397411 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491801533134 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120483653519 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418101205286 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.