Organized tour to remote community and other countries is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment

Essay topics:

Organized tour to remote community and other countries is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment?

Organizing travellers to rural areas and other regions has become popular these days. I personally think that it is a positive movement to the economic development for local people as well as their surrondings.
Tourism can benefit local’s revenue. Locals can receive annual income from tickets to the places of interest purchased by tourist. Travellers, indeed, tend to give extra payment to the local people in purpose of appreciating their products such as local crafts and native cuisines. Likewise, this condition can help to re-built the enviroment since a lot of travellers went to remote areas with campaigning green world society. In indonesia for example, a lot of tourist visiting Papua, one of the most remote areas in the region, eventually rise the living standard of locals and re-planting a bunch of trees to build healthier environment. The more tourist visiting remote areas, the better the local income and environment are.
Nevertheless, some individuals argue that travellers will only give destructive impacts on rural areas. Furthermore, they said that vast majority of tourists are selfish and tend to discredit the local culture. For instance, tourist usually act rude to local ceremonies. These people ilustarte the condition of what was happened in Papua New Guinie, when tourist intentionally disturb local ceremonies by taking photograph which is not allowed according to local’s rules there.
Sadly, the disagrement of this phenomenon is only based on false information. Some information refering to negative impact on tourist visiting rural places is manipulated by politician who put this given circumtance as their materials for political campaign.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is important to have tourist in remote areas to escalate local’s living standard as well as re-built healthier environment, therefore, campaigning this movement is highly recommended for better rural areas development.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urchased by tourist. Travellers, indeed, tend to give extra payment to the local ...
^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...local ceremonies. These people ilustarte the condition of what was happened in Pa...
^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'areas'' or 'area's'?
Suggestion: areas'; area's
... is highly recommended for better rural areas development.
^^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ded for better rural areas development.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, likewise, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56375838926 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95731840934 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587248322148 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3806339347 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.533333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234327081868 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800400152911 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579904610483 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134625224096 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838599626686 0.056905535591 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.