Organized tours to remote community and other countries are increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for local people and the local environment?

Tourism is an fascinating and profitable sphere in some countries. In addition people try to use their history, buildings and saightseeings efficiently, and gain from it. However, some individuals opine that organized tours have dranbacks especially for local people and environment, while others think that it helps to develop their economy. Personally, I believe that places with developed tourism have more positive impact rather than negative ones.
One of the most crucial points in problems of touristic attractions is pollution. Furthermore, people from another countries will relax, visit local places and after that will fly to their home and only local people will live and deal with their rabbishes, for example. Moreover, overcrowding for a period may be because of a huge number of tourist. For instance, humans prefer to spend summer in Turkey, Dubai and in European countries in the spring or autumn and for this seasons such places will experience a big amound of immigrants as well. For local people it will be hard to move by means of transport or to hang out in some places.
On the other hand, tourists help to develop country’s economy by visiting places with a rich history and buying local product as well as eating traditional food. Therefore, citizens can improve their own businesses and earn more profit in particular fields such as in medical sphere in Korea, in shopping centres in European countries or in resort and hotels in Turkey. Thailand. In addition, local people will try to improve aspects that refers to local individuals with negative impact.
In conclution, organized tours have clear advantages and disadvantages, but before organizing such kind of outicities people should think about their results. If touristic organizations look after their quest, local attractions or people will not have problems. Thus, I think country with well-organized tour will gain more benefits than lose from it.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
Tourism is an fascinating and profitable sphere in so...
^^
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...profitable sphere in some countries. In addition people try to use their history, buildi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople try to use their history, buildings and saightseeings efficiently, and gain ...
^^
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in problems of touristic attractions is pollution. Furthermore, people from anot...
^^
Line 2, column 470, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...untries in the spring or autumn and for this seasons such places will experience a b...
^^^^
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anizations look after their quest, local attractions or people will not have prob...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in particular, kind of, such as, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28064516129 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81635072844 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577419354839 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7702474928 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.133333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1333333333 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327085067019 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110873170597 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800659175169 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208853455095 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0139671039146 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.