Overfishing is a serious global problem that threatens ocean wildlife and biodiversity. Loss of marine life brings a further threat to the millions of people who rely on seafood for protein and livelihoods.
Overfishing is a serious global problem that poses a threat to marine species and biodiversity. The deficiency of ocean wildlife also brings a further threat to numerous individuals who rely on seafood for protein and nutrients. There are several reasons behind this phenomenon, including the rising consumption of fish and the illegal fish-catching situation. In this essay, I will clarify these aforementioned issues, along with several solutions to handle this problem.
To begin with, the upsurge in global population has been leading to the rising consumption of fish is one of the main reasons for the problem. Indeed, in recent years, while environmental contamination has become gradually prevalent, people tend to pay attention to their health more by probably choosing foods such as aquatic foods which contain rich nutrients and proteins. This is leading to the likelihood of mounting demands of consuming seafood that reinforce the fact of catching more fish to satisfy these demands. What’s more, illegal and unregulated fish catching is also regarded as a main cause of this hassle. Catching fish without abiding by governmental and international regulations, for example in protected zones, or not reporting part of the catches.
Therefore, several solutions can be adopted to overcome this challenge. One of the most imperative steps is the implementation of sustainable fishing practices. The fishermen should attempt to not only control the number of fish caught but also maintain the ecological balance of marine life. Furthermore, the government is also making a contribution to preclude overfishing by imposing regulations and implementing political backgrounds to promote sustainable fishing practices. Besides the endeavors of fishermen and government, local inhabitants also play an important role in protecting oceanic creatures. They can choose food alternatives that contain numerous proteins as fish meat, for example, plant-based meat, to eliminate the pressure on fish stocks and promote sustainable fish production in the long term.
In conclusion, the overfishing of the world’s oceans become a major threat to the survival of aquatic creatures, and it also poses a potential danger to the livelihoods of people. Several adverse consequences are driven by this phenomenon, nevertheless, the responsible involvement of fishermen, the government, and fish consumers will contribute to strengthen the sustainable environment for marine lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-20 | thaokim2003 | 84 | view |
- People s character is influenced by environment rather than genetics To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Some people think goverments should spend mowney on measures to save languages with few speaker form duying out completely Others think that this is a waste of financial resources Discuss these both views and give your opinion 78
- The chart below shows the number of classes taught per week by teachers in a school in Someland in the year 2013 73
- overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems what are some of these problems how can governments and individuals tackle these problems 89
- Some people think healthcare should be free for everyone others think that people should pay for their medical costs themselves Discuss both view and give your own opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2111.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70540540541 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18527129936 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562162162162 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1558965031 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.176470588 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7647058824 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198106059758 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703117661817 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103089385851 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137057037311 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996420989743 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.