Parents often give children everything they ask for and do what they like. Is it good for children? What are the consequences when they grow up?
Parental approaches to raising children surely play a vital role in a child's development. Many parents often over-indulge their offspring, and I believe that this method would negatively impact their individual growth and have consequences as they enter adulthood.
It is human nature to love their children, however pampering is a poor choice of rearing. Parents often provide everything their children want, which would make children bear in mind that they deserve to receive anything they wish no matter how unreasonable requirement is. Of course, the pampering also greatly affect the formation of the child's personality. Children who are indulged excessively will be arrogant, aggressive, hard to control their emotions not only with friends but even with adults older than them, which was thoroughly researched by Dr. Grinker and published in the American Journal of Psychiatry in 2005.
There are more significant effects when children grow up. Firstly, they lose the ability to solve problems themselves due to too dependent on parents when they were kids. A simple barrier in their life or work may become an insurmountable adversity, which can lead to failure in life. Furthermore, according to one research also shown that children who were pampered at a young age were also more likely to become isolated individuals in class and society, had poor academic performance and a higher rate of alcohol, smoking and fights compared to those who do not or little pampered.
In conclusion, over-indulgence is a harmful practice that leaves major bad effects on children and the consequences that last into adulthood. Therefore, parents should search and replace with a more proper rearing style.
- The graph below shows changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001 89
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 70
- The charts give information about world forest in five di erent regions 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36431226766 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87520454532 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669144981413 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.3899402734 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274530949221 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963132470671 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848608742135 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152923710473 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443528025429 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.