In the past, people spent their entire lives doing one job. But nowadays, they change their
jobs frequently. Please give the reasons and your suggestions.
Though the experience of moving from one job to another can sometimes be distressing or even
traumatic, thousands of employees move from one job to another in rapid succession every year.
Conventional reasons people give for job hopping include lousy bosses, miserable salaries and
hostile work environments. Yet the fundamental reason has always been hidden and thus ignored by
the general public.
The job hopping frenzy can be attributed mainly to the remarkable social changes taking place
nowadays. The 21st century is characterized by the rapid rate of change. Nations around the world
are experiencing dramatic shifts in their political, economic and social structures. These shifts have
radically changed how people view job hopping. The days when being on a progressive career path
meant staying at the same company for life are long gone. Neither employers nor employees
directly link long service with loyalty now. Employers no longer think that the number of employers
an individual has worked for provided the best measure of loyalty. Instead, they now place more
emphasis on ensuring that employees are engaged and committed during the time they spend with
them, believing this is more likely to deliver results. This means there is scope for employees to
switch jobs with relative ease and take charge of their own progression and development at their
own pace.
Despite the irresistible and irretrievable social change, there are things that HR managers can
do to improve the current situation. It should be noticed that sometimes employees choose to leave
because they find that the jobs or the workplaces are far from what they have expected. The
working hours are not as promised, training or promotions don't come through, and managers may
have misrepresented pay offers. To narrow expectations, HR managers should sample job
experiences before the interview to give job candidates a more complete picture about working in
the company.
- In the past people spent their entire lives doing one job But nowadays they change their jobs frequently Please give the reasons and your suggestions 92
- In the past people spent their entire lives doing one job But nowadays they change their jobs frequently Please give reasons and suggestions 74
- Many people think that countries have a moral obligation to help each other while others argue that aid money is misspent by the governments that receive it and therefore international aid should not be given to poor countries Discuss these two points of 46
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 73
- Many people think that countries have a moral obligation to help each other while others argue that aid money is misspent by the governments that receive it and therefore international aid should not be given to poor countries Discuss these two points of 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 5, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ys been hidden and thus ignored by the general public. The job hopping frenzy can be attrib...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 20, column 59, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...not as promised, training or promotions dont come through, and managers may have mi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42122186495 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73165461055 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639871382637 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0700350688 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.375 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 7.06120827912 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 21.0 4.38176352705 479% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186270806057 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534833412634 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457815634692 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0483874019022 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430592428487 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.