People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In the contemporary life, people has more chances to buy low-priced products. Although, that has some issues, I believe that it brings more positive than negative aspects.
On the one hand, there are a lot of minor points with cheap products. First and foremost, the main factor is quality of goods which costumers would use. For example, low-priced clothes are easier to lose colors after once or twice use that maybe could not happen with high-priced one. Therefore, people who buy those seems to waste money for new items in a short time. Secondly, the safety of goods is a problem that should be considered. For instance, because the big benefits many Chinese products are generated from low priced materials such as household appliances or toys which contain the amount of poison. As a result, if people use those goods in the long-term that impacts on people’s health, especially children.
On the other hand, cheaper products has more advantages than disadvantages. Firstly, these goods bring more choices for people who has the low incomes. For instance, the domestic goods are much cheaper than imported goods which are forced to pay a high tax. Consequently, instead of buying the expensive products which some people are not suitable for their earnings, people not only could buy cheaper goods but also receive a good quality from those goods. Furthermore, this trend stimulates consumption and economic development. This means that the more good products with low price are manufactured, the more costumers spend money on buying. that leads to encourage the competition between different companies to create cheaper goods along with best qualities for clients.
In conclusion, generating cheaper products is becoming a trend in the present market. it seems to me that this tendency has more plus points than drawbacks.
- People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- In many countries, governments are spending a large amount of money on improving internet access. Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money? 78
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree about this opinion 78
- The charts compare 5 different sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 645, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...e more costumers spend money on buying. that leads to encourage the competition betw...
^^^^
Line 3, column 743, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the best'.
Suggestion: with the best
...companies to create cheaper goods along with best qualities for clients. In conclusion, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...becoming a trend in the present market. it seems to me that this tendency has more...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19191919192 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67438430199 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572390572391 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2403243792 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6666666667 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160599281875 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559226696712 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631740693012 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983091918944 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406658724725 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.