Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree about this opinion

Essay topics:

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?

many people believe that protecting wild animals and birds attract too much concern and public funding. Based on my observations, I completely agree with this opinion.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why people paid too much attention on protecting wild animals. first reason is that some animals are becoming extinct, and natural equality could be damaged . In particular, hunting animal activities are increasing significant; consequently, many animals protecting organizations were established to prevent this issue. Secondly, internet development makes people have more chances to approach news about wild animals . For example, if a bear is abused somewhere, this new would be shared rapidly on social networks such as facebook and attract more people to discuss.
On the other hand, spending too much attention and money on protecting animals may has some disadvantages to take into consideration. first and foremost, constructing some research animals centre wastes too much money that seems to be not necessary. For instance, the more difficult research are proposed, the more it costs. Furthermore, there are many urgent things that need to prioritize by government resources rather than preserving animals. it is true that many people are starving because of poverty, so national and local authorities should spend money to improve living standards in those areas.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that there are more important other things need both concern and public resources than protecting wild animals or birds.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-02-15 lehonganh1212 73 view
2023-02-15 duchuynh 67 view
2023-02-13 lehonganh1212 73 view
2021-07-20 TuronKuzibaev 51 view
2021-07-04 Rudraksha surve 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
many people believe that protecting wild ani...
^^^^
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...h attention on protecting wild animals. first reason is that some animals are becomin...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t, and natural equality could be damaged . In particular, hunting animal activitie...
^^
Line 2, column 457, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nces to approach news about wild animals . For example, if a bear is abused somewh...
^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...sadvantages to take into consideration. first and foremost, constructing some researc...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...sources rather than preserving animals. it is true that many people are starving b...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50617283951 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84588452428 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59670781893 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5903716785 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.923076923 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3076923077 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403161990133 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137533442478 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932934678578 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246195024943 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809237801736 0.056905535591 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.