People these days watch TV, films and other programmes alone rather than with other people.
Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, cinema industry has become an imperative parts in our daily life. Hardly do a day elapse that activities involved in a course of a day omit watching films and TV. However, people are allocating more time for doing those things in isolated places rather than with others. From my own perspective, I believe that the disadvantages do considerably outweigh the advantages.
On the one hand, first and foremost undeniable of insular watching is utmost comfort given that you don’t have to negotiate with anyone to choose which film to see or you can pause, turn up, down the volume at your disposals. Moreover, in the case of introvert people, they are of diffident disposition and have the propensity to conceal their inner emotions towards groups of people. Therefore, when watching TV surrounded by other individuals, they will not express what the hearts are telling them. What is the point of seeing films without being able to luxuriate in character’s feelings and thoughts?
On the other hand, the drawbacks are pertinent to drastic social relationship interference. Obviously enough, spending greater time alone can diminish your communicative capacity and loosen your bond with family members, friends and other acquaintances. In the past, we used to watch recreational programs together, discuss it, laugh together so harmoniously. Whereby facilitate and create more spectra for later conversation. This is, now, less likely for us to initiate a talk, and we are becoming unprecedentedly loath to be engaged in any discussion. If this phenomenon continues to plague our modern civilization in a long term, the repercussions are exceedingly difficult to reserve.
In conclusion, even though via seeing films insular can people bask in utter convenience, however, the shortcomings it brings are also tremendously terrible. To counteract, we should reconcile between personal and communal time by substituting family time for solitary counterpart.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-26 | MEBC Class | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | durianisticism | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-19 | leanguyen | 95 | view |
- More and more people are relying on their private cars as a major means of transportation Describe some of the problems over reliance on cars can cause and suggest at least one possible solution 89
- The graphs below show the cinema attandance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- The diagram shows the water consumption and residential water usage in Australia in 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting key features and make comparison where relevant
- The maps below shows the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45098039216 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10287535165 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68954248366 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4315544182 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.25 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266266846611 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664381363819 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637979091808 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136231775954 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834931960087 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.