People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
It is widely believed that the prices of petrol for cars and other vehicles should be increased by local authorities in order to address envronmental issues. While I consider that this might be effective measure, I would consider that other measures might have an even greater impact.
On the one hand, there is clear evidence for people to support the view that the raise taxes on fule can solve two environmental problems. To start with, it is a well-known fact that motorists who has private cars would limit the number and length of journeys to compensate for the extra expense. The governments would then upgrade and expense public transport provision in order to help easily travel for people to many different places as a typical example. In addition, there is no disputing that in terms of freight services, goods transported by rail rather than by truck. Accordingly, both these measures would cut down on emissions from vehicles as well as reduce the greenhouse effect.
On the other hand, there are obvious perks that could be witnessed from the fact that while the rise in fuel prices might be a stopgap measure, governments could adopt transport policies which would be more effective in the long term. To start with, it is commonly believed that congestion charge could be considered as one of useful measures. For instance, local authorities in London, introduced this measure on all vehicles visiting the city center. They use the money not only raised to subsidize the cost of fares but also invested in transport infrastructure. This gives rise to improve air quality and reduce exhaust fumes. Additionally, it is important to introduce bus and train passes in order to increase the use of public transport. Ideally, this activity would reduce pollution from private cars and combat global warming as well.
In conclusion, a sharp rise in petrol prices would be a useful environmentally-friendly transport measure, although in the longer term other steps would be more effective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 73
- It is widely believed that the prices of petrol for cars and other vehicles should be increased by local authorities in order to address envronmental issues While I consider that this might be effective measure I would consider that other measures might h 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 416, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...der to help easily travel for people to many different places as a typical example. In additio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 653, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...uld cut down on emissions from vehicles as well as reduce the greenhouse effect. On the o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, so, then, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08814589666 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84965714061 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6039721618 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191187036442 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608810250316 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053486000432 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115243229095 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406212963713 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.