People think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
It is true that many people believe that national authorities should raise the cost of fuel for vehicles such as cars or motorbikes to solve environmental degradation. I would argue that there are measurement effect to tackle issue in order to protect environment.
On the one hand, there are variety of reasons why government need to increase the cost of fuel for vehicles. Firstly, raise taxes on petrol gas will prevent to use for unnecessary journeys, reducing dependent for fossil fuel. Secondly, private car will be discourage the use of cars and other vehicles, for example, in London, the authority raise prices on fuel, then instead of using car for work people are tend to choose public transport to work, declining exhaust mission release for environment.
On the other hand, I concur that the authority should adapt method to solve environmental issue. In term of flight to climate change. Government should allocate resouce to find renewable energy in order to decrease environmental degradation. For instead, the government can attribbute money for university to find alternative enery to preverse environment. For the perspective of envinronment resources, the environment should impose policy to protect environment when the exploitation of the mineral resources is now become more danger for global warming.
In conclusion, I believe that nation authorities need raise cost of the fuel, but the government should adapt policy to protect environment issus to stop greengouse.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
- People think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 56
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, for example, in London, the authority raise prices on fuel, then instead of us...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 234.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38888888889 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98867086745 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8834410035 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.636363636 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390787946101 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144442769762 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911711779352 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232880718365 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619516020409 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.