People’s lifestyles have drastically changed over the past decades. Most people are living a more modern lifestyle than before, thanks to improvements in technology and healthcare. In my point of view, people’s lives are better than their ancestors’ in some aspects, while it is in converse in other aspects.
With respect to modern facilities, people are living a more convenient life by using new tools and gadgets which facilitate their transportation, safety and health. For instance, they are taking advantage of faster and more reliable transportation vehicles than before. Moreover, modern buildings and civic infrastructure keep people safer than in ancient times. Also, with the advent of new medicines and drugs, life expectancy soared noticeably, even in developing countries. As another instance, the infant mortality rate dropped about tenfold during the past century as a result of extreme growth in healthcare.
In contrast, when it comes to the drawbacks of a new lifestyle, it has deteriorated from social relations view. Nowadays, individuals are more isolated than in past decades which is a consequence of the modern era. People work harder to make their ends meet and as a result, they do not have adequate time to spend with their families and friends. In addition, some cultural norms such as community service and self-sacrificing are vanishing because of overworking. Not only this but also the families have become smaller and the family support for children is less than before.
In conclusion, although from some perspectives the standard of living has improved in recent decades, it has declined from other perspectives. People live a more technological and safer life, but they suffer from social problems.
- The best way to remove poverty in developing countries to provide 6years of free education to all children so that they can read write and use numbers Do you agree or disagree 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- The bar charts below show UK and US energy consumption in 2000 and 2006 67
- The chart shows the water levels of 6 cities in Australia Darwin 1 Sydney 2 Melbourne 3 Brisbane 4 Perth 5 and Canberra 6 in October 2009 and October 2010 73
- People today generally have better lives than people in the past did To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41758241758 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99932233487 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.0564524591 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.6 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242339001101 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821059609242 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642118784341 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155885474297 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760050059956 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.