People today generally have better lives than people in the past did.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Life in the past and today were totally different. There are people who claim that the living conditions, many years ago was better than what people have today. This claim could be argued because there are so many advancements developed today that have made life more comfortable than the past.
Undoubtedly, life in the past had its own beauty. One thing was their lives were simpler because of fewer distractions. There was no internet and people really establish connections with each other in the present. For instance, Facebook and other social media sites were non-existent and people make friends with people in their locality. Second thing, in the past, there was less traffic, overpopulated cities, and less pollution. The cities were not congested because there was fewer people and urbanization was not yet popular. According to articles about life in the past, the majority of citizens stay in their rural areas or hometowns because of lack of transportation facilities, thus overcrowding and traffic congestion were not even considered problems.
However, despite the charm of old living, it had posed major difficulties to the citizenry. The old times had no efficient forms of transportation and communication. For instance, traveling from provincial lands to cities took days via buses or trains. Also, people had to use snail mails to communicate with relatives or friends who are living far. These problems are no longer existent in the twenty-first century because of technological advancements and the invention of the internet.
Today, life is more enjoyable to live than in the past. The development of technology raised living conditions by making it easier and faster. There is much equipment invented in order for people to have time to do activities they enjoy or develop other useful skills. One example is the use of electrical home appliances, these items consume less time and effort to perform household chores, such as vacuum and washing machines. Subsequently, with less time on these chores, family members can have time to bond and children can have more parental attention. Another advantage of living in the present is the increased availability of information and fast communication. These advancements had changed the shape of different lives of people into better ones. Many people have lifted themselves out of poverty, and others have found a more positive sense in their well-being.
Overall, it cannot be denied that there would always be people who would prefer to live life like in the past than in the present. However, it cannot be denied that the tremendous positive shift in living conditions makes the present more enjoyable to live.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-09 | Manideep Macherla | 73 | view |
- Some people think that economic progress is the only way to measure a country s success while others think that there are other factors which can be used to measure a country s success What are these factors And among them which one is more important 79
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 73
- Interviews have always been the most common way to choose among job candidates Some people now think that there are better ways of finding the right person for a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 72
- It is better to learn the way people lived in the past through films and video records than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Too much money is wasted on repairing old buildings that should be used to knock them down and build new ones To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, really, second, so, thus, well, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2268.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 433.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23787528868 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80921038329 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519630484988 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.0 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.924430121 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.72 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.32 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298422638263 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087451504379 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878046491392 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176579641288 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100269325078 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.