People who do not use social media networks will always fall behind in career development opportunities.
To what extent do you feel that this is an accurate and important prediction?
The advent of virtual environment has offered extremely quick and effective means of information circulation. These media, however, are not as credible as more traditional ones like newspaper and job agencies. Furthermore, they are mostly used for entertainment. As a result, people tend to feel reluctant in using the media to find a job. Having said that, large companies normally announce their job vacancies in newspaper, job agencies or websites designed for this purpose which will even further decline the importance of such social media.
Given that one finds a job through social media, the contributing factors in maintaining and job progression are qualifications, interpersonal communications besides their undeniable role in finding a job. For example, a qualified PhD graduate has more chance to find a job through their social circles than in the jungle of Internet. Following that, their work skills and efficiency is a more defining factor to further career than number of group membership in social media. The other deciding factor is people skills. At work, someone who is more friendlier with colleagues and more productive has more potential to step up the ladder in their profession.
In conclusion, though social media are integral part of our lives and they may play their part in finding job, career progression cannot be guaranteed by social media.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | mylinh3001 | 84 | view |
| 2021-05-31 | Quân Lê 2020 | 95 | view |
| 2021-04-20 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-03 | pyg165@yahoo.com | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-16 | aghaei.arsalan | 56 | view |
- In many countries truancy is a worrying problem for both parents and educators What are the causes of truancy and what may be the effects on the child and the wider community 78
- Many people today are worried about the large quantities of waste produced by ordinary households What problems are caused by household waste and what solutions may be possible in both the short and the long term 81
- Some people say that the main way to be happy in life is to have a lot of money How might having a lot of money make people happy What other things in life can make people happy 87
- The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- People who do not use social media networks will always fall behind in career development opportunities To what extent do you feel that this is an accurate and important prediction 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 439, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...job vacancies in newspaper, job agencies or websites designed for this purpose wh...
^^
Line 2, column 546, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'friendlier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: friendlier
... people skills. At work, someone who is more friendlier with colleagues and more productive has...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inding job, career progression cannot be guaranteed by social media.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 218.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31651376147 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9565812656 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623853211009 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7377732491 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.363636364 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137512585913 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587324368218 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440428661459 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104247888156 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266818316219 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.