People who do not use social media networks will always fall behind in career development opportunities.
To what extent do you feel that this is an accurate and important prediction?
The importance of presence on social networking sites has been a topic of interest in recent times. It has even been suggested that ineffective utilization of such powerful platforms inevitably hampers one’s career growth. Despite being true to a number of cases, the comment is largely groundless, as will be shown in the following essay.
It is no coincident that social media networks play an indispensable role in keeping many businesses thriving in a competitive world. The key role of these sites is to expand the scale of virtual interaction, attracting new customers and building a sizeable following. This lays the foundation for future business activities. Social influencers and streamers have learnt to exploit such a fertile land, as they are given lucrative deals to endorse certain products to their followers. Those with an established career can also harness social media for the same effect. For instance, there are a number of doctors and lawyers who record videos to post on Youtube to attract viewers, generating another income source and further fortifying their careers in real life.
However, to claim that one’s career will always be retarded if not for social media is an exaggeration. First and foremost, for the majority of careers, advancement is achieved when skills have been bolstered and sufficient experience has been gained as they are acknowledged accordingly. For instance, a person cannot work as a doctor without a college degree, not to mention having to train for an extended period of time. Interpersonal skills also factor in, especially the ability to negotiate and persuade. This is best illustrated by a businessman’s efforts to secure important business deals and up his status. Evidently, having a known presence on social media has little to do with the aforementioned progression. If anything, there runs a risk to improper management of accounts on these sites, as leaking a sensitive photo or sharing a controversial post has been enough for companies to dispense with the services of some careless employees.
In brief, while career development can be facilitated by virtual social platforms, these are by no means the driving factor for everyone. While some professions may benefit tremendously, at its core, growth is only achieved when specialized and socializing skills have been improved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | mylinh3001 | 84 | view |
| 2021-05-31 | Quân Lê 2020 | 95 | view |
| 2021-04-20 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-03 | pyg165@yahoo.com | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-16 | aghaei.arsalan | 56 | view |
- The plans below show the changes at a small theater in 2010 and 2012 67
- Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The use of software makes it unnecessary for people to know how to spell words correctly these days Do you agree with this statement 84
- The use of software makes it unnecessary for people to know how to spell words correctly these days Do you agree with this statement 84
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention in school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: IT_IS_NO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'not' or 'now'?
Suggestion: not; now
... shown in the following essay. It is no coincident that social media networks p...
^^
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...mention having to train for an extended period of time. Interpersonal skills also factor in, e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 955, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he services of some careless employees. In brief, while career development can b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, however, if, may, so, while, for instance, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33780160858 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01131466538 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595174262735 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5133475486 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.611111111 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7222222222 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177036144857 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571123881838 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557513725319 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100833824276 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254566515449 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.