A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
As society develops, the differences between rich people and ordinary people become complicated, because nowadays almost all people can afford most of materials which only could be held by wealthy. Due to this complication, the society focuses more on materialistic judgement by the possessions. Even though the old way to judge people (trust, kindness, honour, honesty and politeness) tend to be seemed forgot, the old way is still playing an important role in many parts of society. This essay will discuss these views in depth.
As the society changed into full materialistic worlds, where people can be able to possess majority of durable goods, the fine details becomes the measure to define the differences between rich and poor. In the case of vehicles and travel to overseas be the only option for wealthy, but nowadays anyone can have. The detail for those items such as the types of vehicles and the types of travel are becoming the new measure to judge other people’s status. Since people are focusing too many on tiny details for the distinction, people are forgetting about the old ways to measure people’s value. Therefore, it is common that people are judging other people by material possessions for the distinction between wealthy and ordinary people.
However, it does not mean that the old ways of valuing others is completely gone. The societies will be enlightened to consider the use of old way of measurement to judge other person. In the case of one of my friends, Maria Rakichinan, despite she is a daughter of a secretary general in Indonesia, she was being impolite and selfish. Due to her bad attitudes, all school mates did not like her and the school president had been forcing her in order to drop out from the school. Like this case, the society is expecting people to have a certain behavior regardless with their wealth. IN other cases, many corporations and employers are still seeking candidates with a well-mannered personality. Therefore, the society has forgotten about the old-fashioned ways to judge people.
In conclusion, it is very common to see that people are judging others by possessions. However, people would be recognized the importance of the traditional ways to judge people by seeing the personality of wealthy and the employment selection.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | Leauren | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | Nweze christabel | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | Nweze christabel | 67 | view |
- By punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is also guilty of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010. 84
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the year 1990 and 2010. 73
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 67
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the materials') or simply say ''most materials''.
Suggestion: most of the materials; most materials
...e nowadays almost all people can afford most of materials which only could be held by wealthy. Du...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'well', 'as for', 'in conclusion', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.262295081967 0.247107183377 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.154566744731 0.155533422707 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.103044496487 0.0946595960268 109% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0374707259953 0.0501214627716 75% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0234192037471 0.0437548338989 54% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124121779859 0.122226691241 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0468384074941 0.0403226058552 116% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82852803904 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0374707259953 0.0326793684256 115% => OK
Particles: 0.00234192037471 0.00163938923432 143% => OK
Determiners: 0.100702576112 0.0861772015684 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.016393442623 0.021408717616 77% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00468384074941 0.011925033212 39% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2303.0 1933.35771543 119% => OK
No of words: 379.0 316.048096192 120% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0765171504 6.12580529183 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20517956788 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.385224274406 0.374742101984 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.290237467018 0.28420135186 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.182058047493 0.203846283523 89% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.12401055409 0.137316102897 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82852803904 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.037074148 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525065963061 0.56093040696 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 57.6409055691 60.7387585426 95% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0891783567 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0555555556 20.7743622355 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1627139122 49.517814964 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.944444444 127.492653851 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0555555556 20.7743622355 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 0.814263465372 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 50.0793022574 49.1944974215 102% => OK
Elegance: 2.01086956522 1.69124875643 119% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194010589318 0.332605444948 58% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.109835040413 0.102741220458 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0877509612245 0.0668466124924 131% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.523111572461 0.534860350844 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.151682592906 0.148594505496 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907141860186 0.134430193775 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465838266388 0.0742795772207 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.483477823107 0.324371583561 149% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0150357153992 0.0638462369009 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150886671045 0.228012699653 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320789025777 0.058150111329 55% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.68436873747 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.41683366733 146% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.4468937876 144% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.