A person worth's nowadays seems to be judged accounting to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honor, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent, do you agree or disagree with this opinion ?
Over the past couple of decades, human behaviour standard has never ceased to draw public attention and provoke debates. Although the importance of ethic value such as kindness, trust and so on, has already been recognized and accepted through a myriad of years. The issue as to whether these old value is no longer suitable for nowadays and should be light-weighted remains controversial. In my opinion, old-valuable ethic standards are still crucial for the following reasons.
Firstly, behaviours and characteristics are used to judge a person's morality. some may argue that those who having high social status always behave in correct ways. This argument could be true to some extents. however, they should take into account the fact that not all high social status people have suitable behaviour, there are some who doing professional jobs and wearing luxurious clothes, but it does not mean they act correctly, as the saying goes " you cannot judge a book by its cover". For instance, if there is a traffic accident, the victim is in emergency and he or she needs to go straight to the hospital. however, many people turn the bind eyes on to not get involved in that situation. The one who can save the victim at the moment is a kind and tolerance person, the one who have been taught to do the right things at the right time, regardless of their status or possession.
Secondly, it is important to recognize that old-fashioned ethics are used to teach children. When we all were kids, we used to be taught to become a good citizen. however, those are who against old ethic standards are ignorant of the fact that possession can buy anything, except morality. Society need those who can devote themselves to make things better, not those who spend money to destroy something that lasts for many years.
In conclusion, under no circumstances would traditional ethics completely be replaced by social status and material possession as mentioned above.
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015. 73
- A person worth's nowadays seems to be judged accounting to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honor, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent, do you agree or disagree with this opinion ? 89
- Some people believe that employers should not be concerned about the way their employees dress, but the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ed through a myriad of years. The issue as to whether these old value is no longer suitable f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 61, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...and characteristics are used to judge a persons morality. some may argue that those who...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...s are used to judge a persons morality. some may argue that those who having high so...
^^^^
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...d to judge a persons morality. some may argue that those who having high social statu...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 210, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...argument could be true to some extents. however, they should take into account the fact...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 632, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...e needs to go straight to the hospital. however, many people turn the bind eyes on to n...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... to be taught to become a good citizen. however, those are who against old ethic standa...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'needs'.
Suggestion: needs
... buy anything, except morality. Society need those who can devote themselves to make...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99696048632 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74256786183 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604863221884 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1114248093 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165047673677 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493261400743 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386788982508 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960500616923 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327731245013 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.