A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Many today contend that personal identities are defined by social rank and wealth. Despite the benefits they give, I would argue that the conventional values still play an important role in modern society, as they are the mottos of life.
The primary reason why I am convinced that social hierachy and richness cannot express people' cores is the lack of emotional expressions. It means that the human emotions are not interfered through how much money you have or how influenced you are. Entertainment industry is one of the most salient examples, of which some celebrities have been found guilty and imprisoned for money laundering. It is partly because they rushed for searching reputation, stable life, or acceptance.
If, on the one hand, social level or wealth just indicate the possessions of material, on the other, it is the major cause leading to depression or anxiety. Provided that it were not for the acceptance, people would bare less pressure of being success as they are defining, thereby understanding the core value of life. Additionally, tradition is not a taboo, since it guides people get back on track after experiencing failure. Being grateful for having food, for instance, is a traditional Vietnamese behavior that reminds us how hard our nation has to suffer to be fed, which also helps children know the values of hard-working.
In conclusion, I reckon raking popularity and richness in society is redundant and irrelevant. Meanwhile, it is necessary for people to repect old tradition as they still have influence to how humanity behave.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-12-04 | tsln7607 | 56 | view |
2023-09-15 | Nowshin Tabassum | 61 | view |
2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 73 | view |
2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 67 | view |
2022-08-14 | ThanhNT | 89 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, while, as to, for instance, i reckon, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84725702363 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640625 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6430207818 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0807103026676 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.027853714747 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0220633431502 0.0667982634062 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0477513724185 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221633603693 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.