A person worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old fashioned values such as honour, kindness, and trust no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the last few decades, people have been judged according to their possessions and how much money they have. I strongly disagree with this opinion; it kills many moral values such as kindness, trustworthy, honour and generosity. this essay shows that keeping positive ethical is important than one’s social status.
Firstly, we live in a materialistic era. Not only do people judge others through their social status but also they judge them by appearance which affects our children’ personalities. bullying is one of the worst problems in schools which has been raised due to their community thoughts, as they judge friends according to their clothes’ brand. For example, a study has been published by a societal magazine showed that 65% of students in the educational system are suffering from depression after being bullied, physically or emotionally, by their mates. Moreover, making friendship between students depends on how rich they are. For instance, a survey has been done by Cambridge University showed that 60% of students were making friends according to their appearance and school expenses.
Secondly, many people treat others in injustice way in government offices. For example, if you needed to get a document done from a government office and you looked rich, you would not have to queue in a line. In addition to that, most families refuse to marry their daughter to a person from a lower social class. For example, in 2017, an article has been written in an Egyptian newspaper showed that the percentage of unmarried women increased; families are looking for rich groom without focusing on the importance of moral values such as dignity, kindness, and trust.
In conclusion, in the modern era, money and social status are playing an essential role in judging people; however, in my point of view, the priority of judgement should be given to values such as honour, kindness, and trust.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-16 | BASEM MOHAMED | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | MO86 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Ahmed karem Mahmoud Ahmed | 89 | view |
- Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor.What are some of the reasons for world poverty? How can the poor be helped?Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge 61
- Life was better when technology was simpler. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 67
- Modern children are suffering from the diseases that were once considered to be meant for adults only Obesity is a major disease prevalent among children What are its causes and what solutions can be offered 63
- In many countries, smoking is now illegal in public places. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- A person worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ss, trustworthy, honour and generosity. this essay shows that keeping positive ethic...
^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Bullying
...fects our children' personalities. bullying is one of the worst problems in schools...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20833333333 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75606549722 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9600632394 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.071428571 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18067982643 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585961848541 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546254472587 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125502582544 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469099071535 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.