The position of women in society has changed markedly in the last twenty years. Many of the problems young people now experience, such as juvenile delinquency, arise from the fact that many married women now work and are not at home to care for their children.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of juveniles’ problems and its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, whereas women have succeeded to promote their social position in society, various problems of youngsters are attributed to their absence from home due to their occupation, whether full-time or part-time. In my mind, young people’s issues such as delinquency stem from enormous factors beyond merely the attendance of married women at workplace.
Obviously, several elements could be contributed to the problems of adolescence. Unlike the fact that, nowadays humans witness the ever-increasing elevation of women’s social status among societies, in miscellaneous countries, like developing ones, the majority of females are housewives. According to surveys, the figures of juvenile delinquency don’t show considerable decline in such regions. Hence, such contributions as socio-economic circumstances of families, ubiquity of sophisticated technologies, and the changes were taken place since 21th century, i.e., the global village concept, should be taken into consideration as other effective factors.
Moreover, most women spend more or less 8 hours in their workplace, often at the mornings, which is equivalent to the same time that youngsters should be at their primary or secondary schools. As a result, working hours of mothers do not apparently interfere with their maternal responsibility regarding breeding their children up. Consequently, it is unlikely that there is a considerable relationship between women’s work and the rise of juvenile’ problems.
On the other hand, loads of people, men in particular, believe that women must stay all day at home. This belief is not only observable amongst low-level societies, but also across cutting-edge nations. They are of the opinion that house and all stuff which are related to home belong to housewives. Ergo, they propose the idea that juvenile’s problems and the absence of their mothers from home go hand in hand.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on both sides, I am inclined to believe that spending a proportion of day at workplace by women can lead to colossal advantages in terms of far better children’s upbringing approaches. I, as a man, would become mad, when I have to stay at home for more than a couple of hours.
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work Some people regard this as completely wrong while others consider it as valuable work experience important for learning and taking responsibility What are your opinion on this 84
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that life experience is more important than the formal education provided is schools and universities How far do you agree with this statement and provide examples 88
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, whereas women ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, moreover, regarding, second, so, whereas, in particular, such as, as a result, more or less, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.525 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17542526558 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638888888889 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0536315219 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.3125 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3125 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276083165942 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797010498034 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524854714058 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138651040398 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587342572288 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.