Q12 : The spread of multinational companies and the increase of globalization produces positive effects for everyone. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, a rise in the number of international corporations has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that a growth in international companies in the era of globalisation positevely affects individuals, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that ordinary people can reap a myriad of advantages from the development of international corporations. Perhaps the principal benefit is that international businesses who have branches in local countries can stimulate economic growth in local
nations. This is because they create numerous employment opportunities, leading locals to find well-paying occupations with greater ease. Furthermore, from the customers' point of view, they are more likely to have an improved standard of living thanks to increased options, meaning that they are capable of purchasing a variety of global products in the market. For these reasons, there does seem to be a solid basis for several of the arguments in favour of globalisation.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that the advancement of global businesses merely brings with it positives. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that local nations can suffer from brain drain given that the majority of international corporations have a predisposition to provide higher salaries and more perks for their employees. Therefore, domestic firms can have difficulty hiring competent job seekers, which often prevent them from competing with international corporations. In addition, international businesses can give rise to cultural conflicts since some of them are inclined to enter local markets without thoroughly investigating local policies and environments. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s can stimulate economic growth in local nations. This is because they create num...
^^^
Line 4, column 475, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e arguments in favour of globalisation. On the other hand, it seems short-sighte...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22291700956 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612794612795 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4888348943 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.214285714 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0455070668628 0.244688304435 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0150966733973 0.084324248473 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0223819272558 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.027070680923 0.151304729494 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245779097182 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.