The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinions.
The 21st century ushered in various forms of technological innovation which has made life easier for people. Some persons believe this advanced gadgets contribute to the widening gap between the rich and the poor while others opined that the reverse is the case. this essay will look at both sides of the argument.
Advent of different types of technologies in various spheres of human lives has gone a long way in the betterment of living conditions for both the affluent and the less privileged. For instance, Computers do not discriminate between its users and does not classify individuals into socal strata. it receives command from both the wealthy and the poverty stricken as long as you know the right commmand to key in thus showing that the benefits of scientific innovations are available for use by both the rich and the poor.
Although advanced equipment abound for utilization by the residents of every society, these technological inventions might not be readily accessible to certain members of the populace due to the expenses needed to procure them. For example, a man from the lower social class who cannot feed himself three times daily will not invest in a computerized wristwatch even when the advantages of the latter are numerous while a person at the top of the ladder of economic success can afford to have a garage full of sophisticated cars and motorcycles not minding the cost of buying them. A man walking down the street without a means of transportation and another who drove past in a Ferrari are definitely not on the same rung of the economic ladder. this is an aspect in which it can be noted that technology further widens the gap between the poor and the rich.
In conclusion, I believe the pros of technological advancement far outweighs the problems of widened space between the people of lesser and higher means. thus, I think its sustenance should be encouraged and the government can provide subsidies on the price of these advanced equipment making it easily accessible for the poor and this can help to close up this invisible gap between different social strata.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-25 | fhu | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Harpreet Singh Kooner | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | smiles | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | Muhammed_10 | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-26 | Inpu Nguyen | 73 | view |
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 84
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 73
- Process diagram showing the production of five types of tea. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me persons believe this advanced gadgets contribute to the widening gap between t...
^^
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...rs opined that the reverse is the case. this essay will look at both sides of the a...
^^^^
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the case. this essay will look at both sides of the argument. Advent of dif...
^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...classify individuals into socal strata. it receives command from both the wealthy ...
^^
Line 5, column 748, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... the same rung of the economic ladder. this is an aspect in which it can be noted t...
^^^^
Line 8, column 155, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
... the people of lesser and higher means. thus, I think its sustenance should be encou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94957983193 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74110210507 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574229691877 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.2121895961 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.25 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.75 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190153115636 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720331714206 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649621544758 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116803614502 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224317318324 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.