Recently some people can work from home using modern technology. Some think this only benefits the workers, but not the employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

As the invention in technology is increasing day by day, people are benefited by using the various facilities of it in various fields. One of them is work from home concept introduced by many organisation for their employees for the benefit of associate as well as company. It is said that by this concept only employees get benefited and not employer but I am not totally agree with this view.

First of all the work from home concept helps the employees to balance their work life and family life. Working from home gives flexibility in time to work which does not give pressure to reach office on time and give freedom from the hustle and bustle of the city. Women associates can devote their time for family as well as child along staying at home and work in flexible duration. The predominant benefit of working from home is Cost savings on fuel and extra expenses. This facility helps more to the women who

On the other hand, employer gets benefited by saving the extravagant costs towards the maintenance of building and infrastructure, cost of electricity bill and other facilities. Also the employer do not require to take the responsibilities of the employees during their stay in the office.

But as every coin has two sides, this concept has few disadvantages too. Such as for employer it can be very difficult to reach out to the associate easily and to monitor the daily work done by them. Employees working from home get distracted by family chores, noise, insufficient facility at home, disturbances by child during client calls and etcectra.

To conclude, work from home concept has both the side to employer as well as employees. Its a choice of those who opt for this option and should balance both family and work life.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun organisation seems to be countable; consider using: 'many organisations'.
Suggestion: many organisations
...is work from home concept introduced by many organisation for their employees for the benefit of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his facility helps more to the women who On the other hand, employer gets benefit...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... towards the maintenance of building and infrastructure, cost of electricity bill...
^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... electricity bill and other facilities. Also the employer do not require to take the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: taking
...ities. Also the employer do not require to take the responsibilities of the employees d...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ient calls and etcectra. To conclude, work from home concept has both the side...
^^
Line 9, column 68, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...e concept has both the side to employer as well as employees. Its a choice of those who op...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
... side to employer as well as employees. Its a choice of those who opt for this opti...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, well, as for, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81125827815 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64973706817 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.418005597 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.785714286 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221105946569 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851659142535 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036854396194 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123819637193 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543192436378 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.