Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Environmental issues are a heated debate in recent years. Although many essential steps have been taken by many governments to handle global environmental problems, individuals have more responsibility to tackle these issues. In my opinion, collaborative efforts of both government and people can bring down the environmental damage in the world.
To begin with, since environmental issues are a greater concern for many governments, they have initiated several laws to protect our nature. Whereas, as individuals, we have certain responsibilities to minimize our contribution to this damage. Firstly, if we make minimal alterations in our day to day life, we can reduce the severity of these problems to a great extent. For example, using more public transportations rather than privately owned vehicles cut down the fuel usage and thus reduce the possible pollution rate.
In addition, even if people prefer to use plastic bags as they offer more comfort, they should accept and use the paper bags which is considered more environmental friendly. Of course, government can ban plastic bags internationally, but it is up to us, how we ignore the plastic bags.
Moreover, many researches are ongoing to use the renewable energy sources effectively by government. If individuals are not ready to accept the new invention like solar energy, windmill and so on, then there is no point to invest large amount on it to solving the threat to environment.
In conclusion, I would like to emphasize that, government authorities are accountable to ban plastic usage and to conduct awareness programs since it decraese the use plastic and create awareness about the consequences of more cars on street. Even though growing global environmental damage is great concern to all governments, it is our duty to follow the rules and regulations to protect the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | Phạm Phú Trường | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | PardissRS | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | vudinhthuyornot | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | Vũ Thuỳ Liên | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | Vũ Thuỳ Liên | 84 | view |
- Below is a line graph showing the incidence of mental illness as indicated by receipt of incapacity benefit amongst older UK males from 1971 2015 The reform in the benefits system took place in 1995 78
- Below is a line char showing incidence of serious crime in a large UK city from December to November Total incidence of violent crime are shown in addition to incidence of 4 serious crime types 74
- Decreasing birth rates and superior health care has resulted in the increase in the older population in many parts of the world This trend according to the many experts can cause serious problem in the society to what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Few artists ever manage to achieve fame let alone a liveable wage Often artists struggle to make ends meet for most of their lives For this reason some people believe that it is irresponsible for a parent to encourage their child to pursue an artistic car 72
- The bar diagram below shows the number of houses per year in 2 cities, Derby and Nottingham between 2000 and 2009. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...individuals are not ready to accept the new invention like solar energy, windmill and so on, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, then, thus, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, of course, in my opinion, to begin with, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31525423729 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14448761417 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583050847458 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7290329711 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.615384615 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2307692308 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170735111375 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554165306284 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349802930148 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837915754014 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471074625984 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.