Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

Essay topics:

Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

it is true that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. While the advantages of this can eclipse the downsides if attendants have a high sense of responsibility, the opposite can be the case if they don’t have a good technical preparation for meetings.

In case people attending these meetings have their personal self-discipline, the benefits will be far more significant. In fact, compared to offline meetings, these reduce time and financial pressure on companies. In the past, to take part in a meeting, some participants have to travel from a long distance to meet others but in the present, with the help of internet and social network, everyone can have online discussions from everywhere. if they are reponsible and focus on dicussing, this will results in the improvement of business efficiency.

As for unprepared participants, however, the negative implications will be greater. One of the most worth mentioning of these is that when participants have an online meeting from remote areas, they can have some technical limitations or slow internet connection. if this happen during the meeting unpredictably, the progress will be interrupted, leading to a delayed and inefficient conference. Another drawback could occur if attendants lack for skills of using the internet. A case in point is that the elderly, who updates the latest applications slowly, may find it difficult to get used to online programs. Consequently, conferences will take more time to begin.

In conclusion, although it is more advantageous to enterprises if participants observe the rules, the benefit will be overshadowed by the drawbacks when they can’t prepare a good enough facility.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-02 wardiati 67 view
2019-12-11 Lai Nhu Phuong 84 view
2019-11-24 Tt617 84 view
2019-10-21 phanduydat 11 view
2019-10-20 phanduydat 11 view
Essays by user tominhduc :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is true that business meetings, discuss...
^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...me and financial pressure on companies. In the past, to take part in a meeting, so...
^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ave online discussions from everywhere. if they are reponsible and focus on dicuss...
^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...sible and focus on dicussing, this will results in the improvement of business efficien...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...imitations or slow internet connection. if this happen during the meeting unpredic...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, so, while, as for, in conclusion, in fact, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4552238806 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24271550272 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578358208955 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4827387797 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.461538462 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14149690705 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676948839167 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137370413446 0.0667982634062 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103237665791 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946743878203 0.056905535591 166% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.