Responsible tourist means that people should preserve both environment and culture when visiting another place. Some people say that is impossible to be 'responsible tourist' .To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a common belief that visitors can hardly protect the environment and respect the local culture while visiting a tourist attraction in another place. Much as some people may agree with this idea, from my perspective, modern travelers are more likely to be responsible for the aboriginal surroundings and traditions.
To begin with, foreign tourists can defend the environment in the longing countries. This is because they, at school, are usually taught to protect the environment not only in their own country but also in the rest places of the world. Therefore, tourists nowadays can be more aware of the significance of the environment around them, compared with those in the past, who tended to damage the environment of the sightseeing place. It is not uncommon to see that a good many visitors sort their leftover and put it into the corresponding trash bins after having a wonderful lunch in the wild field of the beauty spot.
In addition, exotic visitors can conceivably preserve the native tradition. The main reason why some opponents persistently consider the visitors to be endemic culture invaders is that these tourists in the past had little knowledge of the original tradition in traveling. Now, current travelers can have a great deal of access to the custom in the admirable place ahead of their travel time. For example, the visitors can, on the Internet, acquire plenty of information about the place where they will go, having comprehensive understanding of it. Therefore, they may very much possibly show a large amount of respect to the aboriginals when they are visiting.
In conclusion, in the light of the above mentioned discussion, I firmly maintain that visitors, no matter where they are from, cannot fail to obey the laws of protecting the local environment and culture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-18 | Frank Chen | 89 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 67
- In many countries, there are more people choosing to live by themselves than before. What are the reasons of this situation? Is it positive or negative to the development of society? 73
- Schooling is no longer necessary, since more and more information is accessible on the Internet, and students can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: University students should be required to take basic science classes even if they are not part of the field of the study. 81
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 306, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding environment'?
Suggestion: the surrounding environment
...an be more aware of the significance of the environment around them, compared with those in the past, who t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion about the place where they will go, having comprehensive understanding of it...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09395973154 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83237379877 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60067114094 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7215471909 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185748733818 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651523987758 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554516426208 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113084964521 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814958647111 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.