Should old buildings be destroyed and replaced with modern ones?
There is a common belief that old buildings are supposed to be destroyed and replaced with the current constructions. I hold the idea that the dilapidated houses should be removed, while the historic ones should be well preserved.
On the one hand, protecting the historical constructions may enjoy plenty of benefits. To begin with, they can expand the visitors’ outlook. In general, these buildings are a token of a city’s past, witnessing the development of the city. When visitors from all over the globe come to see them, they can come across plenty of ancient artifacts, thus increasing their historical knowledge. Also, the cherished constructions can bring in revenue to the local government. Once the visitors outside the city pay a visit to them, they have to spend a large amount of money on food, admission tickets and so forth. A large part of this expenditure may come to the government in the form of taxes.
On the other hand, dismantling the derelict residential houses and building modern ones can also be beneficial in many ways. To begin with, this action can bring convenience to the house owners. To be specific, modern houses are usually equipped with updated facilities, such as heating systems, which can help them avoid feeling cold in the winter. Besides, the dangerous buildings can be detrimental to the local people’s health if they are not destructed. The reason why the houses are called dangerous is that they may collapse at any situation, especially in bad weather. Accordingly, the people who are living in there are more likely to be hurt when the houses break down during a rain storm.
In conclusion, according to what has been discussed above, my firm conviction is that the buildings which possess historical values should be well protected, or the ones should be replaced by modern buildings.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- Sending criminals to prison is not an effective method of dealing with them Education and job training should be used instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istoric ones should be well preserved. On the one hand, protecting the historic...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the government in the form of taxes. On the other hand, dismantling the derel...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...houses break down during a rain storm. In conclusion, according to what has bee...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, if, look, may, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in general, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07516339869 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87347832715 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578431372549 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2818286991 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0625 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375881024237 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110625671162 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129805407655 0.0667982634062 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276137112074 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171799068796 0.056905535591 302% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.