Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples fr

It is believed that repairing old architectures in center cities required a massive investment from the government. Others argue that these expenses should be implemented in building citizen's houses and public roads. In my point of view, preserving cultural buildings is necessary but that should be seen to a specific extent so other infrastructures can be established as well.
To begin with, along with the concentration on civilization development, restoration of historical buildings should be considered as a prerequisite. Antique architectures mark humanity's achievements and demonstrate advancement. For this reason, big cities, especially those that remain intact buildings should pay their best to preserve them under any circumstances. A prime example, Paris, the well-known city for representative buildings of past centuries has accomplished many high-rated restorations such as the popular Effiel Tower
On the other hand, apparently, not any old-fashioned ones need to be restructured. Several architectures are having substandard structures which are unable to be repaired or required costly expenses to bring it back. Using that money for the improvement of houses and roads is definitely recommended. For instance, instead of spending money repairing an old temple, authorities in Lang Son decided to remain its destruction traces as a reminder of vandalism that was caused by war. They made up their mind to use that money for the upcoming residence.
In conclusion, conservating antiquities is encouraged to remain human historical days, otherwise, authorities should carefully decide which one deserve restoration and using those expenses for building houses and public roads

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78884462151 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36562613001 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.649402390438 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1590503302 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.083333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235648283049 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833220351077 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403903984526 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139360562721 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169703019463 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.